Game of the Year Award Musical Stage Presentation: A Critical Examination
Introduction
The Game of the Year (GOTY) Award is one of the most prestigious awards in the video game industry. It is awarded annually to the game that is deemed to be the best of the year by a panel of judges. In recent years, the GOTY Award has been accompanied by a musical stage presentation that has become increasingly elaborate and controversial.
This article will critically examine the complexities of the GOTY Award musical stage presentation. It will provide a brief history of the presentation, discuss the various perspectives on it, and analyze its potential impact on the video game industry.
A Brief History of the GOTY Award Musical Stage Presentation
The GOTY Award was first awarded in 1984 to Ultima III: Exodus. The award was originally given to the game that received the highest score in a poll of video game magazines. In 1998, the Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences (AIAS) was founded and took over the responsibility of selecting the GOTY Award winner.
The AIAS also created the GOTY Award musical stage presentation, which was first held in 2003. The presentation has since become an annual tradition, and it has grown increasingly elaborate over the years. In 2016, the presentation featured a full orchestra and a cast of dozens of dancers and singers.
Perspectives on the GOTY Award Musical Stage Presentation
There are a variety of perspectives on the GOTY Award musical stage presentation. Some people believe that it is a fitting tribute to the best game of the year. Others believe that it is an unnecessary and expensive spectacle. Still others believe that it is a way for the video game industry to legitimize itself as an art form.
Those who support the presentation argue that it is a way to celebrate the creativity and artistry of video games. They point out that the presentation is often visually stunning and musically impressive. They also argue that it helps to raise the profile of video games and attract new audiences.
Those who oppose the presentation argue that it is a waste of money and resources. They point out that the cost of the presentation could be used to fund other initiatives, such as developing new games or supporting independent developers. They also argue that the presentation is not necessary to recognize the best game of the year, and that it simply serves to glorify the winners.
Potential Impact of the GOTY Award Musical Stage Presentation
The GOTY Award musical stage presentation has the potential to impact the video game industry in a number of ways. First, it could help to legitimize video games as an art form. By presenting video games in a concert setting, the presentation could help to change the perception of video games as being merely a form of entertainment. Second, the presentation could help to attract new audiences to video games. By showcasing the best that the industry has to offer, the presentation could pique the interest of people who are not currently gamers.
However, the presentation could also have some negative consequences. First, it could lead to increased costs for video game development. If developers believe that they need to create elaborate presentations in order to win the GOTY Award, they may be less likely to take risks or experiment with new ideas. Second, the presentation could lead to a focus on spectacle over substance. If the GOTY Award is given to the game with the most impressive presentation, it could discourage developers from creating games that are truly innovative or groundbreaking.
Conclusion
The GOTY Award musical stage presentation is a complex and controversial issue. There are valid arguments both for and against the presentation. Ultimately, it is up to the video game industry to decide whether or not the presentation is a worthwhile investment.
If the industry believes that the presentation is a way to celebrate the best of the year and attract new audiences, then it should continue to support it. However, if the industry believes that the presentation is a waste of money and resources, then it should reconsider its commitment to it.
